Monday, June 14, 2010

Reinforcing Swing Sets

I voted

never voted with feet as big lead.
Small (?) Story that has nothing to do with our community cares, denounced by the REMINDER:
" At Fosse-la-Ville commune of Sart-Saint-Laurent, office No. 10 was installed in the parish hall, which was decorated with a crucifix. The presence of the latter rightly upset many voters. One of them demanded the withdrawal to the President, but she refused, saying it was too small ...
In Brussels, several assessors were women wearing the veil in Molenbeek, rue van Kalck ( Office 37) in Laeken, Avenue of the Pagodas, 141 (Office 88), Saint-Josse, Saint-François (room 3), Brussels, 30 Rue des Riches-Claires (room 22), 18 rue Felix Sterckx ( Office 55) and in Schaerbeek, 103 Avenue of Roodebeek (room 68).
One of them, Office 88 to Laeken, also wore a long coat that showed only the oval of her face. Several voters have asked to speak to the president office, which replied that the assessor performed his civic duty and the need to show them respect.
The presence of religious symbols in a polling clearly contributes to "confessional" a space that is devoted to political matters, should be protected from any interference of religion.
courts, governments, schools and official polling places are symbolic in which it is imperative that no religious symbol could give the impression that the trial, suffrage, the user service or training is done under the eyes of God. The presence of a crucifix, a serious breach of this principle.
As the veil by an assessor, in addition to being a religious message inside a chamber devoted to politics, it can also be legitimately interpreted in a context where the question of the veil divides the world politics, as a sign of support to one or the other contending party or a political system.
"

0 comments:

Post a Comment